Phone Phone (Hover)
WhatsApp WhatsApp (Hover)
Phone
Call
++1(970)567-7400
WhatsApp
Whatsapp
Login In Sign up

Asia

North America

Asia

North America

EPO: G 1/23 & G 1/24 – Key Patent Law Rulings (2025)

IPcrossark
Patent
2026-04-14 08:56:40
 

In 2025, the European Patent Office (EPO), the authoritative institution responsible for

patent granting and supervision in Europe, issued two landmark rulings — G 1/23 and

G 1/24 — which have profoundly reshaped the practice of patent application, examination

and protection across the European region. These two rulings, released in June and July

respectively, aim to standardize patent application norms, enhance the stability and authority

of patent rights, and have sent important signals to global innovators and enterprises

seekingpatent protection in the European market.

 

Released in July 2025, Ruling G 1/23 has made a clear and strict definition of prior art in patent

applications. The EPO explicitly held that any product publicly sold before the patent filing date,

regardless of whether its internal structure, core principle or technical details can be fully

reproduced or analyzed through conventional means, shall be deemed as prior art. This ruling

effectively eliminates a long-standing loophole in the industry — some applicants used to

avoid prior art barriers by selling products without disclosing their internal technologies, and

this practice is no longer feasible after the implementation of the new ruling. For enterprises,

this means that the threshold for patent application has been raised, and comprehensive prior

art search before filing has become more critical than ever.

 

Earlier, in June 2025, Ruling G 1/24 put forward stricter requirements for patent claim drafting

and interpretation. The EPO ruled that in the process of patent examination and dispute

settlement, the interpretation of patent claims must always combine the description and drawings

of the patent application, rather than being limited to the claims themselves. This adjustment

tightens the alignment between patent claims and technical disclosure, requires applicants to draft

claims more rigorously, ensures that the scope of protection claimed is consistent with the

disclosed technical content, and avoids the situation where overly broad claims are approved

without sufficient

technical support.

 

Critical takeaways from the two rulings are clear: first, public sales of products will be regarded as

prior art, regardless of whether their internal technologies are analyzable; second, patent claims

cannot be read in isolation, and full and accurate technical disclosure is mandatory; third,

non-compliance with the two rulings will directly increase the risk of patent invalidation or the

scope of protection being narrowed, bringing huge economic losses to enterprises. For

enterprises and innovators planning to apply for European patents, understanding and

complying with these two rulings is the premise of successfully obtaining patent protection

and avoiding unnecessary losses.

 

We are committed to helping global innovators and enterprises navigate the changes brought by

EPO’s new rulings. Our professional team has in-depth insights into Rulings G 1/23 and G 1/24

and rich practical experience in European patent applications, providing one-stop services

including comprehensive prior art searches, standardized patent claim drafting, and whole-process

patent prosecution management across European jurisdictions. Partner with us to effectively avoid

risks,secure robust patent protection in the European market, and steer clear of costly pitfalls.

 

 Patent businesshttps://www.ipcrossark.com/en/patent.html?cid=16

 Official EPO Website:https://www.epo.org/