Your illustration appears on a canvas sold by an unfamiliar store. Another listing puts the same image on a metal sign, while a third changes its colours and adds text.
Before reporting the listings, connect the artwork you control to each disputed use. A useful complaint identifies the work, explains your authority to act and directs the recipient to the specific material concerned.
This guide focuses on evidence preparation and DMCA notices involving suspected print-on-demand art infringement in the United States.
Copyright can protect sufficiently original illustrations, photographs and other visual artwork once fixed in a tangible medium. General ideas, artistic themes and common symbols should not be confused with protected expression.
The U.S. Copyright Office’s guidance for visual artists explains these distinctions.
Prepare a record containing the original artwork, drafts, revision history and relevant agreements. If someone created the image for your business, check the ownership documents and your authority to enforce the rights.
A receipt for commissioned artwork should be reviewed alongside the agreement rather than treated as a complete explanation of ownership.
Review merchandise licences, stock-image terms, distributor agreements and any permissions previously granted.
Check whether they cover:
The particular artwork and product category.
The relevant territory and period.
Print-on-demand production.
Sublicensing or use by fulfilment partners.
Any quantity or distribution restrictions.
A store may use an unfamiliar name while operating through an authorized channel. Record the permission check before alleging that its use is unauthorized.
Place the original artwork beside the disputed image. Identify matching composition, linework, illustrated details or other relevant features.
Record cropping, recolouring and added text. These changes require assessment; their presence alone does not settle whether the use is lawful.
Avoid claiming ownership of a broad subject, such as floral illustrations or mountain landscapes.
Identify whether the complaint concerns artwork printed on merchandise, a copied product photograph or both.
A digital mockup may show a disputed display without establishing that a physical product was manufactured or sold. Keep those observations separate in your records.
Capture the complete page, URL, listing identifier, seller information, product variants and collection date. Retain the relevant images and descriptions alongside screenshots.
Where a lawful test purchase is appropriate, preserve the order confirmation, payment record, shipping information, packaging and received item.
Connect the purchased product to the listing through identifiers and transaction records. A parcel’s return address may identify a fulfilment location without establishing who selected or uploaded the artwork.
Keep an unedited evidence folder and use copies for annotations.
The Copyright Office’s Section 512 resources explain the notice-and-takedown process.
A notice should substantially include the required signature, identification of the copyrighted work, identification and location of the disputed material, contact details, and the required good-faith and accuracy statements.
Use the relevant provider’s reporting channel or designated DMCA agent. Check permissions and potentially applicable legal exceptions before submitting the allegation.
Save the notice, attachments, acknowledgement and response. Removal is a provider action, not a court judgment or compensation award.
If a counter-notice arrives, obtain advice promptly. A compliant counter-notice can trigger restoration procedures unless the provider receives the required notification of a filed court action.
Maintain a separate record for each new listing, including its date, seller name, identifier and images.
Similar descriptions or mockups can provide investigative leads. They do not establish that every store shares an owner or operator.
Distinguish repeated availability of the artwork from conclusions about coordinated conduct. For related reporting and operator-identification issues, see our online copyright enforcement guide.
Copyright protection, registration and eligibility for particular remedies are separate questions.
Sections 411 and 412 address important registration-related requirements and timing rules. Review the work’s status, registration history and alleged infringement dates with U.S. counsel before predicting litigation options.
The Copyright Office publishes the relevant text in Chapter 4 of Title 17.
A colour change alone does not resolve the issue. The protected expression, alleged copying, permissions and applicable law require assessment.
Not necessarily. Preserve purchase and transaction records separately where sales matter.
First confirm the ownership arrangements or other authority allowing your business to act.
No. Removing material and obtaining monetary relief involve different requirements.
Gather the original work, ownership records, permission documents, listing URLs and a clear comparison.
Organize the evidence around your immediate objective: removing specific listings, clarifying permission or assessing repeated use.
For documentation and registration enquiries, visit our copyright services page. Qualified U.S. counsel should assess litigation, disputed ownership and counter-notice responses.
Fields marked * are required. We usually reply within one business day.
We will reply by email within one business day. This window will close automatically.
